01
Evidence First
We do not rely on posture, summary slides, or declarations alone. Material claims must be traceable to an artefact, a measurement, a recorded review, or an executed test.
Operating principles
Principles
The public principles that govern how TRARDI Group frames engagements, forms judgments, handles evidence, and states the limits of its work.
This page is not a manifesto. It is the operating charter we expect our work to meet: claims tied to evidence, judgments that remain independent under delivery pressure, and boundaries stated plainly before an engagement begins.
Operating principles
02
Independence of judgment
We do not soften a finding to preserve momentum, protect a narrative, or avoid discomfort. If a system does not hold, the judgment must say so clearly.
03
Conflicts and scope
We distinguish build work, readiness work, private audit work, and official conformity assessment. We state which role we are playing, what the engagement covers, and what it does not.
04
Confidentiality
Client matter stays client matter. We do not publish names, logos, artefacts, or internal findings without explicit agreement. Public method and private evidence remain separate.
05
Ownership and reversibility
Contracted deliverables are meant to remain usable after the engagement ends. Code, documentation, configurations, and operating logic should be transferable without artificial dependency.
06
Named accountability
A risk without an owner is not governed. Important findings, remediation paths, and acceptance decisions should have a named accountable person on the client side.
Limits of our engagements
- —an official certification under the AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, or comparable schemes
- —a regulatory guarantee
- —a formal legal opinion
We deliver methodologically defensible findings, not official certifications or legal advice.
For a discussion about a mandate: contact@trardi.com